Assessment vs. Evaluation
As teachers, it is supposed that one of the most important aspects we
take into account when practicing our profession, is to have the aptitude and
auspicious knowledge of why and when to evaluate. In second language
evaluation, and I think in most of the subjects from different fields, it is
necessary to take into account that this is a relevant aspect within learners’
as teachers’ process, because it drives students’ learning (Genesee and Upshur,
1999) and as a personal opinion, the fact of assessing students makes teachers aware
of the self-assessment they implicitly do, since the learners’ results partly
depend on the kind of instruction they receive and the teacher’s class methodology,
this one as regards of self-performance and strategies to develop the class and
then assess his/her students .
As mentioned above, Genesee and Upshur state the concept of ‘Assessment’ as a useful
tool for students’ learning process, but we might question about the reason why
he did not mention the word ‘Evaluation’ instead of ‘Assessment”, and it
happens because these two seem to be synonyms, but they can be controversial,
since they are related one another in the same field but both of them are
addressed to different purposes.
In my opinion, ‘Assessment’ and ‘Evaluation’ can be considered as
subjective research processes that every teacher does in his or her class
sessions, but the results obtained during the procedure are not formally set up
as a project or investigation. In this case what counts is the experience, observations
and strategies the teacher comes up with, or the standards the school
curriculum has to establish in order to have a well-organized education system,
this one as a means of categorizing students’ level to determine if they are or
not ‘fully prepared’ to go on to a more complex tier.
Regarding these two concepts, I would like you and me to question ourselves
about what of the two options we have implemented so far, and if that one is
the most accurate for us as teachers and the most beneficial for the learners
as well. In the one hand, we have the job to test students, grade them along
with different tasks and estimate the final results of their performance during
a period of time; it does not matter if Fulanita’s pet died the morning of the
exam, if Juanita did not study because of a problem at home, or if Pepito
performed pretty well during the period, but in his final task he got a ‘terrible’
score. When we evaluate students, we take into account final results; a 3-page
exam is what tells everybody if you are a brilliant or a poor student, but have
we wondered the reason why it happens?; I don’t think so, because we are too
busy putting those ‘reliable’ outcomes on an excel table and there is not even time
to notice how big is the effort that most of our students do to have a
meaningful learning process.
On the other hand, there is the human side (Robots can actually tape
grades on a computer); the concept of ‘assessment’ is closely related to
seeking for students’ weaknesses and strengths, and providing a constant
feedback to make them aware of their mistakes or succeeds. When we assess,
there is always the intention to think up better human beings with self-criteria
to critique instead of judging, to experience instead of waiting and to work
cooperatively, instead of isolating themselves just to get a five in their
final exams.
I know that the whole idea of assessment is maybe too desirable in an
education system like ours, a set of standards that are always trying to limit
our ideals to final reports, final tests, final results…everything must be
final, like a product in a supermarket: if it does not suit the requirements,
it will not be exhibited on the shelves. But despite this, as teachers we can
contribute to have students notice that education is not only about their
grades; it is also about knowing each other and caring for everyone’s needs and
expectations. If we demonstrate our students that we DO mind what, how and why
they think so, they will be encouraged enough to fill in any exams, tasks, or even
to accomplish ‘unlikely missions’; they will realize that their teachers are
change agents that always seek for aesthetic experiences and critical views, so
they will not perceive us, just like another brick in their school wall, but an
example to preserve for a professional future.